In traveling around the country the last few years doing
Sell-Through boot-camps, sectional presentations and educational seminars, one
topic that always comes up and demands retail discussion and scrutiny is the ladies
business. Are we devoting too much time, effort and inventory? Does
everyone have the same low bar of “break-even and be happy”. The tone of these
discussions is almost always negative.
I’ve also found in traveling to various clubs that quite
often the amount of apparel inventory overage is usually disproportionately
ladies to men’s no matter what the overall percentage of business per these two
categories. Typically, both as a concept in conversation and in the reality of
scrutinizing the inner workings and merchandising of many shops the questions
manifest themselves around collection buying. It starts with “do we have
room to devote to this kind of presentation” and almost always ends with “do
women buy this way any-more?” Collection buying defined for this conversation
as buying all the items in the collection or a goodly portion (12-15 skus).
This particular shop was doing one-third of their apparel
volume in ladies categories but had an over-inventoried situation that was 50%
ladies goods. In an effort to minimize the amount of space and skus devoted to
the collection mode of buying and merchandising while at the same time perhaps
improving our critical member’s ability to buy for his wife we came up with the
concept of the OUTFIT TABLE.
Grace Schory – Golf Shop Buyer – Ponte Vedra Inn and Club
An Outfit Table displays multiple ladies’ bust forms -dressed with 4-5 piece outfits, surrounded by a size run inventory for each sku as well as shoes, headwear and
accessories that coordinate well with the outfits and create a lifestyle
presentation. Outfits do not necessarily
have to be from the same vendor but should look great together on the busts and
be diverse in color. As the table sells through outfits should be replace by
new outfits (perhaps a new vendor) and certainly a new color palette.
In this case, the table chosen was already housing 12-15
skus. We placed the table in a location where the three full-size ladies’ bust
forms on the table would not block any view across the shop. It is anticipated
that there would be no back-up buy per outfit. Although the dilemma of “we’ll
be out of it if you wait will certainly be true of some outfits from some
vendors, it will certainly not be true of ALL outfits. The point is fill-in purchases for
new outfits could be pre-booked, filled as needed either or a combination of both - this could be viewed as a 'count and fill' area - bought for as needed.
The Rule of Three
In creating displays, most visual merchandisers will often refer to the rule of three, which means that when creating a display, try to work in sets of three. This means that based on how you’re arranging your products, you’ll want to have three of them side by side, instead of just one. For example, if you were arranging things by height, you’d have items that were short, medium, and tall.
The reason behind this thinking is that our eyes are most likely to keep moving and looking around when we’re looking at something asymmetrical, because when we see some symmetrical or balanced they stop dead in their track.
This also alludes to the "Pyramid Principle," where if you have one item at the top, and all other items “one step down”, it forces the eye to look at the focal point and then work it’s way down. Humayan Khan.....shopify.com
The hope is to inspire more multiple piece purchases with this approach by showing more combos and colors in less space and create an area of interest that will encourage regulars to check out immediately what new outfit is being displayed in the shop. This could replace collection buying in the shop, but not necessarily, depending on the size and history at the facility. The main goal is to free up valueable space and to have less residual inventory at the end of a sell -through.